Foreign Key

"Zé Carlos" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.torque.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello, probably i have a silly question, I was testing torque and i have a
schema with a onte-to-one relation mapped like this:

    <table name="novos_jogadores" javaName="NovoJogador">
        <column name="id" javaName="id" primaryKey="true" required="true"
type="INTEGER" />
        <foreign-key foreignTable="jogadores" name="id">
            <reference local="id" foreign="novo_jogador_id" />
        </foreign-key>
    </table>

    <table name="jogadores" javaName="Jogador">
        <column name="id" javaName="id" primaryKey="true" required="true"
type="INTEGER" />
        <column name="novo_jogador_id" javaName="novoJogadorId"
type="INTEGER" />
        <foreign-key foreignTable="novos_jogadores" name="novo_jogador_id">
            <reference local="novo_jogador_id" foreign="id" />
        </foreign-key>
    </table>

on the table 'novos_jogadores' i mapped 'id' as foreign key referencing a
foreign key on 'jogadores', this forces the generator to build a
NovoJogadorPeer.getJogador(NovoJogador x), is any problem with this kind of
mapping with updates, deletions and insertions?

regards
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.