Re: foreign keys, complexDataModel, and external schemas
Helge Weissig <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:51:09 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.torque.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It would help if my links actually hadn't been stripped :( Here they are: project on github: https://github.com/helgew/Torque-Schema-Test schema files: = https://github.com/helgew/Torque-Schema-Test/tree/master/src/main/torque/s= chema generated base classes: = https://github.com/helgew/Torque-Schema-Test/tree/master/target/generated-= sources/torque/org/grajagan getTblLinkInts() in BaseTbl3: = https://github.com/helgew/Torque-Schema-Test/blob/master/target/generated-= sources/torque/org/grajagan/BaseTbl3.java#L168 cheers, h. On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Helge Weissig wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I just ran into what may be a feature or a bug... trying to find = out which: When I define a table in schema1.xml and another two, = including a link table for a many-to-many relationship in schema2.xml, = where schema2.xml includes schema1.xml as an external schema, torque = will not generated the getter methods for the foreign keys. >=20 > To illustrate, I have created a github project. As you will see, there = are two schema files: first-schema.xml and second-schema.xml which = includes the first. The generated base classes for tbl1 and tbl3 differ = in that BaseTbl3 has the getter methods for the link table tbl_link_int = (e.g. getTblLinkInts()), whereas BaseTbl1 does not. >=20 > I think it would be a very useful feature to be able to split a large = schema into several sub-schema files and not lose the ability to = generate these setters! Maybe I am doing something wrong though!? >=20 > Any input would be appreciated. >=20 > cheers, > h.