Re: what is current status and likely future of turbine ?
Peter Courcoux <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I have used turbine on a number of commercial projects, including some very large ones, for many years. I'm just writing a revision for a project and am using turbine 2.4M1. I am pleased to be able to second Thomas Vandahl's comments. It works for me! Regards, Peter AFrieze wrote: > Tony Oslund wrote: >> Adoption of technology should be based upon things such as need, cost, >> ease of use, maintainability, and availability of resources, past >> success, amongst others. >> I find that Turbine in conjunction with Velocity serves these needs very >> well. >> >> I have also wondered at times why this site is very quiet, and then I >> realize that I rarely need to post questions, since there is the >> archive. >> It would be a shame to see a great technology fall by the wayside simply >> because it has been successful, people learn it quickly, the community >> has been supportive, and because others make more noise. >> >> You used the term "several projects", which probably means several >> successful projects. >> >> Perhaps more noise is the answer... >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Nick Ide [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, >> 2008 4:10 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: what is current status and likely future of turbine ? >> >> We have built several projects in the past using turbine. >> We are beginning a new project and trying to decide whether to >> use turbine or try something else. We are a little concerned that >> turbine is dead or dying from lack of community. >> >> My questions: >> >> 1. When will turbine 2.3.3 be released ? >> 2. Is anybody working on that release ? >> 3. Is there any active work on the turbine code base ? >> 4. If there is no work, is that because it all just works or because >> everybody has abandoned turbine in favor of something else ? >> 5. Probably asking the crowd since the people who voted with their >> feet have stopped listening, but what do you suppose >> people have adopted to use instead of turbine ? is it VelocityStruts ? >> >> is it Spring ? Others ? >> >> >> -Nick >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > Just thought I would pop in real quick to let you all know that this > is something I have been very interested in as well. I have worked > heavily with a turbine project for the last 3 years and it has worked > quite well for me. I am about to start a new project, and was also > curious if turbine is dead, or if its just completed and bug free... > > AFrieze > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >