Re: what is current status and likely future of turbine ?
Siegfried Goeschl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | IT20one GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"It just works" - that's the most boring thing you can say about an OSS project but I see is as a big achievement. Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Jeffery Painter wrote: > It is nice to hear from the same old gang again... I remember most of the > recent posters from several years back when I was a Turbine newbie... > > Unfortunately, my career has taken me into the dark side (C#/.net) but I > must agree that if I were to have to write another web based app tomorrow, > I would still pick Turbine. It is a robust (and dependable) system. > > Maybe that is to explain for the lack of traffic in the past few months. > > Most of the projects I created with Turbine 3-4+ years ago are still in > production (as far as I know) and fortunately "just work" > > cheers, > Jeff > > > >> I have used turbine on a number of commercial projects, including some >> very large ones, for many years. >> >> I'm just writing a revision for a project and am using turbine 2.4M1. I >> am pleased to be able to second Thomas Vandahl's comments. It works for >> me! >> >> Regards, >> >> Peter >> >> AFrieze wrote: >> >>> Tony Oslund wrote: >>> >>>> Adoption of technology should be based upon things such as need, cost, >>>> ease of use, maintainability, and availability of resources, past >>>> success, amongst others. >>>> I find that Turbine in conjunction with Velocity serves these needs >>>> very >>>> well. >>>> >>>> I have also wondered at times why this site is very quiet, and then I >>>> realize that I rarely need to post questions, since there is the >>>> archive. >>>> It would be a shame to see a great technology fall by the wayside >>>> simply >>>> because it has been successful, people learn it quickly, the community >>>> has been supportive, and because others make more noise. >>>> >>>> You used the term "several projects", which probably means several >>>> successful projects. >>>> >>>> Perhaps more noise is the answer... >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Nick Ide [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, >>>> 2008 4:10 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: what is current status and likely future of turbine ? >>>> >>>> We have built several projects in the past using turbine. >>>> We are beginning a new project and trying to decide whether to >>>> use turbine or try something else. We are a little concerned that >>>> turbine is dead or dying from lack of community. >>>> >>>> My questions: >>>> >>>> 1. When will turbine 2.3.3 be released ? >>>> 2. Is anybody working on that release ? >>>> 3. Is there any active work on the turbine code base ? >>>> 4. If there is no work, is that because it all just works or because >>>> everybody has abandoned turbine in favor of something else ? >>>> 5. Probably asking the crowd since the people who voted with their >>>> feet have stopped listening, but what do you suppose >>>> people have adopted to use instead of turbine ? is it VelocityStruts ? >>>> >>>> is it Spring ? Others ? >>>> >>>> >>>> -Nick >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Just thought I would pop in real quick to let you all know that this >>> is something I have been very interested in as well. I have worked >>> heavily with a turbine project for the last 3 years and it has worked >>> quite well for me. I am about to start a new project, and was also >>> curious if turbine is dead, or if its just completed and bug free... >>> >>> AFrieze >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >