Re: poll: current Turbine use

Thomas Vandahl <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Tony Oslund wrote:
> I have wondered at times about the cool things that others have done or
> are trying to do with Turbine.  The obvious thing that seems to attract
> developers to tools is new and useful features, or even useful
> approaches.

I always thought that the wiki is the place for those types of information.

> It sometimes seems as if people only submit to this site when they have
> some immediate problem to solve.  It would be great to hear about
> other's techniques, and solutions or just something that they came
> across that is cool.  Answers to individual questions are great, but
> collaborative discussions, debates, etc, are what keep larger groups of
> people interested and help technologies like Turbine thrive and grow.

I'm currently trying to reorganize parts of the internal structure of
Turbine 4. This should allow people to use a generalized approach to
modules and an easier way to create your own module types. I try to
report my progress on the developer list. You are cordially invited to
discuss and to contribute.

> One thing that I created for use with Turbine is a very basic approach
> for re-skinning the same VM in multiple languages.  I also find it
> useful for customizing/re-purposing the same page without having to
> re-code the logic.  We support multiple affiliates who want their own
> flavors of our products, etc.

Thank you for your comments. Please feel free to describe what you did
here or in the Turbine Wiki. I will be happy to look into it. We will
for sure appreciate your contributions.

Bye, Thomas
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.