Re: HttpServletResponseWrapperSetStatusMsgTest

Byron,

Actually, the test expects the following to occur:

 - A status code of 200
 - A reason-phrase populated with the value of the message
   argument from setStatus(int, String)
 - A response header 'GenericResponseWrapper:setStatusMsg'

I will need to double check the 2.1 spec, but my guess is the reason
for failure is the fact that the reason-phrase isn't populated as
expected by the test.  Similar tests, (like those that test sendError)
have been commented out as they expect the reason-phrase to be populated
with the user defined message, but in fact the 2.3 spec was vague in
this area.

Can you verify that the reason-phrase is the cause of failure here?

-rl

On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 13:30, Byron L Bailey wrote:
> 
> Ryan,
> 
> Thanks for your quick response.  However, the reason that I ask is because
> in the Servlet 2.1 Spec it says that when calling setStatus(int, String
> msg), the msg is sent back as the body of the response.  Yet, it appears
> that watchdog expects a blank response since there is no golden file for
> this test and will register a failure if it receives anything other than a
> blank page since the .xml file has exactmatch=true.  Is this a correct
> assessment?  If so, what is the appropriate behavior for this method?
> 
> -Byron
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                                                                                                                        
>                       Ryan Lubke                                                                                                       
>                       <[email protected]        To:       Watchdog Developers List <[email protected]>                    
>                       OM>                      cc:                                                                                     
>                                                Subject:  Re: HttpServletResponseWrapperSetStatusMsgTest                                
>                       07/09/02 01:49 PM                                                                                                
>                       Please respond to                                                                                                
>                       "Watchdog                                                                                                        
>                       Developers List"                                                                                                 
>                                                                                                                                        
>                                                                                                                                        
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Byron,
> 
> Yes, even though it's deprecated, it is a part of the API and still
> valid to call.
> 
> -rl
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 12:51, Byron L Bailey wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This test calls the method HttpServletResponse.setStatus(int, String)
> which
> > was deprecated at servlet API 2.1.  Therefore, should this test still
> > belong in the 2.3 test buckets?
> >
> > -Byron
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> mailto:[email protected]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <
> mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <
> mailto:[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <
> mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[email protected]>
>