antcontrib vs antelope tasks (was Re: <assert> broken in antcontrib 1.0b3 ?!)
Dale Anson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.ant-contrib.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(Heads up, I'm cross posting this to both the Ant users list and the Antcontrib developer list.) Hi Gilbert, Thanks for your comments about Antelope tasks versus Antcontrib tasks. It seems to me that the projects have diverged. It seems that the main focus of the Antelope project has become maintenance on Antelope as a jEdit plugin, while the main focus of Antcontrib has become the C/C++ compiler tasks. I'm still actively maintaining the Antelope stand-alone application, which I think has generally replaced the Antidote GUI that used to be distributed with Ant itself, and I'm still maintaining the Antelope tasks, The Antelope tasks, at least in my mind, were always secondary to the development of the Antelope GUI. When I first contributed the Antelope tasks to Antcontrib (back in Oct 03), I had thought that Antcontrib wanted to be the main repository for external tasks. It seemed like there was some duplication of effort between the two projects, so it seemed to make sense to merge the Antelope tasks with the Antcontrib tasks. Since then, Antcontrib seems to have become more focused on the C/C++ compiler tasks than anything else. I'm still maintaining the Antelope tasks, and honestly, the reason for not getting more of them into Antcontrib are due to lack of time. I tend to write tasks as I find a need for them, then add them to the Antelope tasks, and eventually migrate them to Antcontrib when I find time, which has been sorely lacking. I'll make an offer here to both the Ant user community and the Antcontrib community -- I'm willing to accept any and all help to get the Antelope tasks merged into Antcontrib, or if the community thinks the reverse is more logical, then I'm all for that too. Dale Rebhan, Gilbert wrote: > > > Hi, Dale > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dale Anson [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 5:43 PM > To: Ant Users List > Subject: Re: <assert> broken in antcontrib 1.0b3 ?! > > > /* > Sorry for the late response. Did you get an answer to this? > */ > > No response, your mail is the only one. > > /* > The assert task in antcontrib is based on the assert task from > antelope. > You might try the antelope version, I've verified that you can nest an > <echo> in > it. > */ > > Thanks for your investigations! > The <assert> task works fine with AntelopeTasks 3.2.19 and AntContrib > 1.0b2 > > btw, it's a pitty that the merge of Antelope into AntContrib still > hasn't finished, > feels like it stuck in the middle. > Why not reverse the merge ? Seems like there are more tasks from > Antelope > in AntContrib than the other way - so why not merge AntContrib in > Antelope ? > > Would be nice to have one great AntTask suite instead of two great ones. > > There seems to be something broken in antcontrib 1.0b3 release = > net\sf\antcontrib\logic\Assert.java has 2,18 KB whereas the same class > has 14,3 KB ?! > > Regards, Gilbert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/