Re: Re: Converting Perforce to P4Package

Along the same lines, has anyone thought about writing another CVS 
repository adaptor using the JCVS api?  It's GPLd, does that cause any 
problems or does it just mean that that particular repository adaptor 
would be GPL?  Any objections to doing this?

Jim Ray wrote:
> That's ok with me.  It was just a thought.  I started thinking about it due
> to the gyrations that are in the getWorkingProject.sh script now.  But I did
> some script refactoring that I'm delivering to Maciej in a patch sometime
> this week for building off a label that should simplify some of it.  It
> should also be a little easier to read if we have problems.
> 
> Jim Ray
> Software Configuration Engineer
> Jabber, Inc.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gael Marziou [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:22 PM
> To: anthill-dev-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
> Subject: [Anthill-dev] Re: Converting Perforce to P4Package
> 
> 
>>Has any thought ever been given to using the P4 Java API, P4Package, for 
>>the PerforceRepositoryAdapter?
> 
> 
> What would be the benefits?
> 
> Personally, I find it simpler to use the p4 command line because I
> have to know it anyway,  while I don't really want to learn how to use
> a new proprietary API.
> By reading anthill log file, anyone knowing p4 is able to understand
> what's going on.
> To me,  it seems that not all users of anthill are java developers.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-dev mailing list
> Anthill-dev-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill-dev mailing list
> Anthill-dev-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill-dev
> 
> 

-- 
Matthew Avery
Senior Developer
(513) 470-5316
http://www.einnovation.com/
eInnovation, Inc., located in the heart of the midwest, invents and 
promotes eBusiness software that moves business technology to open 
standards.