Re: Building from Subversion - checkout vs. update
Jim Hague <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.anthill |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 6 December 2005 20:50, Andy Levy wrote: > Is it possible to have anthill check for a working copy of my project > in the working directory, and if one exists, only perform an svn > update as opposed to a full checkout? Not with Anthill OS (I've never use Pro). Adding such an option I guess would be fiddly, as you'd have to add an 'update' function to every revision system backend. FWIW, texts on continuous integration often stress the importance of a clean checkout on each build, so you can be absolutely 100% sure you're not accidentally dependent on previous build artifacts. As it happens, the project I cited earlier does some version/build number substitutions on the code during a release build before building the modules in question so exact version information is always available from the program. I'd need everything to be reverted before being updated... -- Jim Hague - [email protected] Never trust a computer you can't lift.