Re: Building from Subversion - checkout vs. update

Jim Hague <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.anthill
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday 6 December 2005 20:50, Andy Levy wrote:
> Is it possible to have anthill check for a working copy of my project
> in the working directory, and if one exists, only perform an svn
> update as opposed to a full checkout?

Not with Anthill OS (I've never use Pro). Adding such an option I guess would 
be fiddly, as you'd have to add an 'update' function to every revision system 
backend.

FWIW, texts on continuous integration often stress the importance of a clean 
checkout on each build, so you can be absolutely 100% sure you're not 
accidentally dependent on previous build artifacts.

As it happens, the project I cited earlier does some version/build number 
substitutions on the code during a release build before building the modules 
in question so exact version information is always available from the 
program. I'd need everything to be reverted before being updated...
-- 
Jim Hague - [email protected]          Never trust a computer you can't lift.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.