RE: (no subject)

Also is your Tomcat configured correctly to run multiple instances of 
Anthill?  Don't ask me how to do this, sorry, I wouldn't know.  Just wanted 
to point out, don't forget Tomcat.

----Original Message Follows----
From: "Carlton B" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected],Anthill user list 
<anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
To: "Anthill user list" <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Anthill] (no subject)
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:11:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.urbancode.com ([69.44.154.13]) by 
bay0-mc6-f14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 20 
Dec 2005 05:16:19 -0800
Received: (qmail 19072 invoked by uid 510); 20 Dec 2005 13:15:42 -0000
Received: from anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com 
by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20  (spamassassin: 2.61.  
Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.  Processed in 0.017986 secs); 20 Dec 2005 13:15:42 
-0000
Received: from unknown (HELO caladin.urbancode.com) (127.0.0.1)  by 
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2005 13:15:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 19033 invoked by uid 510); 20 Dec 2005 13:15:38 -0000
Received: from [email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 
withqmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61.  
Clear:RC:0(205.152.59.68):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.373533 secs); 20 
Dec 2005 13:15:38 -0000
Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (205.152.59.68)by 
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2005 13:15:36 -0000
Received: from ibm62aec.bellsouth.net ([68.219.67.132])by 
imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP 
id<20051220131521.IRBN20364.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net-GyQ4oS3ROkNRSNIQfJnjG9c4fnWYBokv@public.gmane.org>for 
<anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:15:21 -0500
Received: from carltonlaptop1 ([68.219.67.132]) by 
ibm62aec.bellsouth.netwith SMTPid 
<20051220131521.BSFX11944.ibm62aec.bellsouth.net@carltonlaptop1>for 
<anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:15:21 -0500
X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jFfMLTffd4FOmNdVsG7Fv1wxlo3vwTgIUQ=
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: mailman-anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
caladin.urbancode.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.61
X-BeenThere: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anthill user list <anthill.lists.urbancode.com>
List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill>
List-Post: <mailto:anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: 
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2005 13:16:19.0714 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[90E20620:01C60567]

Yes, that's all you get.  There will be an .anthill.anthill.properties file
in your home dir that references both installations but only points to one.
You can't run multiple instances without hacking the source code.  However,
it shouldn't be too hard to do this.

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
 > [mailto:anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]]On Behalf Of Bankey Bihari
 > Lal
 > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:12 AM
 > To: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
 > Subject: [Anthill] (no subject)
 >
 >
 > Hello,
 >
 > I have 2 installations of Anthill on my machine -- c:/anthillOS, and
 > c:/anthillOS_deploy, one for build, and 2nd for deployment. Both of these
 > installations are configured on different servers &ports. One is 
listening
 > on 8080, and other is listening on 8090. My problem is that whenever I
 > change anthill.registery of one installation, these changes are
 > reflected in
 > the other installation as well. System is permitting me only one
 > installation effectively.
 >
 >
 > Regards,
 > Bankey B Lal
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Anthill mailing list
 > Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
 > http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
 >

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/