Re: Integrating Anthill with a Problem Report systyem?

Thanks for sending this. I didn't know there was an actual place where we 
could make feature requests and thought we just do it through email? :)

----Original Message Follows----
From: Eric Minick <[email protected]>
Reply-To: Anthill user list <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
To: Anthill user list <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Anthill] Integrating Anthill with a Problem Report systyem?
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:32:43 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.urbancode.com ([64.34.169.154]) by 
bay0-mc7-f6.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 27 
Mar 2006 09:31:02 -0800
Received: (qmail 8923 invoked by uid 510); 27 Mar 2006 17:32:30 -0000
Received: from anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com 
by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20  (spamassassin: 2.61.  
Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.  Processed in 0.020257 secs); 27 Mar 2006 17:32:30 
-0000
Received: from localhost (HELO caladin.urbancode.com) (127.0.0.1)  by 
lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2006 17:32:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 8897 invoked by uid 510); 27 Mar 2006 17:32:28 -0000
Received: from [email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 
withqmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61.  
Clear:RC:0(207.99.47.54):SA:0(0.1/5.0):. Processed in 0.450474 secs); 27 Mar 
2006 17:32:28 -0000
Received: from host54a.simplicato.com (207.99.47.54)by lists.urbancode.com 
with SMTP; 27 Mar 2006 17:32:28 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.simplicato.com [127.0.0.1])by 
host54a.simplicato.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC796C0479for 
<anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:30:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from host54a.simplicato.com ([127.0.0.1])by localhost 
(host54a.simplicato.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,port 10024) with ESMTP id 
65101-05 for <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>;Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:30:54 -0500 
(EST)
Received: from [192.168.0.101] 
(c-67-190-19-249.hsd1.co.comcast.net[67.190.19.249])by 
host54a.simplicato.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F5E6C025Efor 
<anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:30:53 -0500 (EST)
X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Z3TmmkSEdPtfpLB7P/ybN8=
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Delivered-To: mailman-anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
References: <[email protected]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at simplicato.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
caladin.urbancode.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no 
version=2.61
X-BeenThere: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Anthill user list <anthill.lists.urbancode.com>
List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill>
List-Post: <mailto:anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: 
<http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Mar 2006 17:31:02.0809 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[38630090:01C651C4]

Some of these suggestions were already in Jira but were unscheduled, others 
were not in Jira yet. I didn't completely grasp Marcio's third suggestion, 
so I'll leave it to him to file the issue at bugs.urbancode.com.

http://bugs.urbancode.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=ANTHILLOS-256
http://bugs.urbancode.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=ANTHILLOS-255
http://bugs.urbancode.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=ANTHILLOS-110

Feel free to add feature requests and bug reports on the Anthill OS section 
of our Jira instance at http://bugs.urbancode.com . If your see a feature 
request there that you like that hasn't been scheduled, please let us know 
on the mailing lists: [email protected] or [email protected] 
(registration required for each).

Regards,
Eric

Res Pons wrote:

>And please don't forget our request:
>
>An AUTOMATED FORCED option to build regardless whether there were changes 
>to the repo or not.  I'm not talking about the MANUAL forced option 
>currently implemented in AH-OS which requires human intervention.
>
>Thanks.
>
>----Original Message Follows----
>From: Marcio Marchini <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: Anthill user list <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
>To: Anthill user list <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [Anthill] Integrating Anthill with a Problem Report systyem?
>Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:44:28 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from lists.urbancode.com ([64.34.169.154]) by 
>bay0-mc3-f1.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 26 
>Mar 2006 04:44:50 -0800
>Received: (qmail 29947 invoked by uid 510); 26 Mar 2006 12:46:17 -0000
>Received: from anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com 
>by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20  (spamassassin: 2.61.  
>Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):.  Processed in 0.017979 secs); 26 Mar 2006 12:46:17 
>-0000
>Received: from localhost (HELO caladin.urbancode.com) (127.0.0.1)  by 
>lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2006 12:46:17 -0000
>Received: (qmail 29921 invoked by uid 510); 26 Mar 2006 12:46:14 -0000
>Received: from [email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 
>withqmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61.  
>Clear:RC:0(206.191.12.34):SA:0(0.2/5.0):. Processed in 2.491308 secs); 26 
>Mar 2006 12:46:14 -0000
>Received: from mail.bedarra.org (HELO bedarra.org) (206.191.12.34)by 
>lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2006 12:46:11 -0000
>Received: from [64.230.99.161] (account marcio HELO [192.168.3.13])by 
>bedarra.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6)with ESMTPSA id 6404534 for 
>anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected];Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:44:43 -0500
>X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jG65bp6Aa76kO4Yk1mY4qzPlp4VIz63r3g=
>Return-Path: <[email protected]>
>Delivered-To: mailman-anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
>caladin.urbancode.com
>X-Spam-Level:
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL,RCVD_IN_SORBS 
>autolearn=no version=2.61
>X-BeenThere: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: Anthill user list <anthill.lists.urbancode.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill>
>List-Post: <mailto:anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>
>List-Help: <mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
>
>Errors-To: anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Mar 2006 12:44:50.0814 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[12AAC1E0:01C650D3]
>
>Eric Minick wrote:
>
>>Marcio,
>>
>>Another approach to limiting the constant email problem would be to have 
>>an option to only send out emails on the first failure. Anthill can 
>>continue spinning it's wheels on the 30 minutes schedule trying to get a 
>>build out, but not harass people about it. Would that make sense for you?
>
>
>
>   Another option is to have Anthill detect if files changed since the last 
>build attempt instead of the last successful build. This would also cut the 
>useless number of emails etc in the case where a build breaks and stays 
>broken for a while. No wheel spinning in vain. So, we have 3 options so 
>far:
>
>1) (your sugestion) Having a UI flag to tell Anthill to only email on the 
>1st failed build. ANthill still spins its wheels in vain in th ecase of a 
>broken build that takes a while to be fixed.
>
>2) (my suggestion) Having a UI flag to make it switch to stoppedSchedule 
>when a build fails. This forces manual intervention on a broken build, 
>which is what we want in one scenario. A person will come and enter a PR in 
>Bugzilla etc. When the PR is closed, the schedule is switched back.
>
>
>3) (my suggestion) Having a UI flag (2 radio buttons) to tell Anthill to 
>detect changes files since a) last successbuild; b) lat build attampt. 
>Currently Anthill only supports b). This forces manual intervention on a 
>broken build, which is what we want in one scenario. A person will come and 
>enter a PR in Bugzilla etc. When a new file is commited (hopefully a fix) 
>the build automatically kicks in.
>
>
>   In fact I think that all 3 are needed to make Anthill flexible and fit 
>more workflow scenarios.
>
>
>marcio
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
>Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill


_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/