Re: Clock Changes did not take effect in my AH-OS
"Res Pons" <[email protected]> Tue, 04 Apr 2006 22:18:37 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.anthill |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for the explanation, it makes sense now, i thought maybe I was going crazy :) ----Original Message Follows---- From: Varban <[email protected]> Reply-To: [email protected], Anthill user list <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]> To: Anthill user list <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Anthill] Clock Changes did not take effect in my AH-OS Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:20:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from lists.urbancode.com ([64.34.169.154]) by bay0-mc9-f6.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 21:18:06 -0700 Received: (qmail 22272 invoked by uid 510); 4 Apr 2006 04:19:42 -0000 Received: from anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.017709 secs); 04 Apr 2006 04:19:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO caladin.urbancode.com) (127.0.0.1) by lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2006 04:19:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 22246 invoked by uid 510); 4 Apr 2006 04:19:41 -0000 Received: from [email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 withqmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:0(68.230.240.38):SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.203956 secs); 04 Apr 2006 04:19:41 -0000 Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (68.230.240.38)by lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2006 04:19:39 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.20] (really [70.191.121.64]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net(InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTPid <20060404041800.IBSX3988.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@[192.168.0.20]>for <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:18:00 -0400 X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jFSUhtxBJ03BW6kf5O8XVaDw8B3GAxsEko= Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: mailman-anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, bg References: <[email protected]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on caladin.urbancode.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61 X-BeenThere: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: Anthill user list <anthill.lists.urbancode.com> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill> List-Post: <mailto:anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2006 04:18:07.0117 (UTC) FILETIME=[C65E83D0:01C6579E] The thing is that the time changed after Anthill calculated the time to the next scheduled build. What happens is that the Anthill scheduler will send a build to the queue, calculate the time till the next scheduled build and go to sleep for that amount of time. However, time changed during that period and your build happened an hour later (or the glass is half empty and the build was on time but the clock moved ;)). From then on the builds should happen on the assigned time. In Pro we used the quartz scheduler that (I think) handles time change better... Regards, Varban Res Pons wrote: >Not sure if this is important or a bug: > >My nightly builds on Anthill OS on a WinXP machine are set to for 3 a.m. >During this past weekend, the PC clock automatically changed to the new >time but the build didn't start until 4 a.m. So this part makes sense. >Well kinda! > >But if most PC clocks or computers are set to change around 1 or 2 a.m. >I'm baffled as to what happened? It doesn't make sense. Should a clock >change require a PC reboot? Or Anthill kept track of time by caching it, >based on the old time? > >_________________________________________________________________ >Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® >Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > >_______________________________________________ >Anthill mailing list >Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] >http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill _______________________________________________ Anthill mailing list Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement