Re: Anthill OS small remark

Daniel,

I'll take a look at how we have things running in OS, but the neater 
approach is track the date of the checkout and just do the revision log 
as of that date. But otherwise, yeah, running the change log earlier 
would be a good approach.

-- Eric

Daniel Le Berre wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>I am quite happy user of Anthill OS for more than two years now. 
>
>However, I noticed a small annoying problem.
>
>I have some unit tests (I should say functional tests) that need several
>hours to run.
>
>I noticed that Anthill was generating the log file for changes from CVS
>after running the build file, hence several hours after getting the
>source code in my case, which is a problem since the logs are often not
>in sync with the real content of the build.
>
>Would it be possible in a next release of Anthill OS to fetch the source
>code from CVS, and immediately generate the changelog file?
>
>That way, the content of the build will exactly map the changelog file.
>
>Keep up the good work,
>
>Daniel
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Anthill mailing list
>Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
>http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>  
>