Re: Build Not required

but now I've added blank lines on a java source file and commited, changing
the revision...   the scheduled build still doesnt work.

On 6/2/06, Eric Minick <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Marcio,
>
> The logic in the build manager works like this (in psuedo code):
>
> checkoutProject();
>
> revisionList = getRevisions();
>
> if (revisionList.isEmpty()) {
>    log( "Build Not required")
> }
>
> if (build.isForced() OR revisionList.isNotEmpty()) {
>    build();
> }
> else {
>    log("Build Not Required);
> }
>
> So if you are seeing two "Build Not Required" messages, it is because
> there are no revisions and the build was not flagged as being forced.
> Currently, the schedules do not support always forcing builds which may
> be the source of your problem. Scheduled builds are always managed by
> the presence of revisions. Ad hoc builds may be forced though.
>
> -- Eric
>
> I found the double Build Not Required messages a bit confusing and not
> terribly useful. I've gone ahead and changed the first to simply be, "No
> revisions detected".
>
>
>
> Marcio Ribeiro wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > my schedules are not ok... even using the force build option, when the
> > build is done everything goes fine, but after the checkout appear two
> > messages:
> >
> > is project up to date?
> > Build Not required
> > Build Not required
> >
> >
> >
> > What's happening???
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Anthill mailing list
> >Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
> >http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anthill mailing list
> Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
> http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill
>

_______________________________________________
Anthill mailing list
Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]
http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill