Re: [Bulk] Re: Build Not required
"Res Pons" <[email protected]> Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:58:38 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.anthill,gmane.spam.detected |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Is it in the latest release or the new version to be released sometime this Summer? ----Original Message Follows---- From: Jim Hague <[email protected]> Reply-To: Anthill user list <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]> To: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Anthill] Build Not required Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:49:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from lists.urbancode.com ([64.34.169.154]) by bay0-mc4-f16.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:49:41 -0700 Received: (qmail 13770 invoked by uid 510); 5 Jun 2006 16:49:43 -0000 Received: from anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.01848 secs); 05 Jun 2006 16:49:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caladin.urbancode.com) (127.0.0.1) by lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 16:49:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 13744 invoked by uid 510); 5 Jun 2006 16:49:37 -0000 Received: from jim-RlTlQ/[email protected] by caladin.urbancode.com by uid 504 withqmail-scanner-1.20 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:0(80.68.81.132):SA:0(0.1/5.0):. Processed in 5.392009 secs); 05 Jun 2006 16:49:37 -0000 Received: from bigben2.bytemark.co.uk (80.68.81.132)by lists.urbancode.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 16:49:32 -0000 Received: from [80.68.90.59] (helo=bloodnok.icc-atcsolutions.com)by bigben2.bytemark.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FnIGX-0007TH-0hfor anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:49:21 +0000 Received: from cpc3-oxfd2-0-0-cust846.oxfd.cable.ntl.com ([82.10.99.79]helo=fluffy.bear-cave.org.uk)by bloodnok.icc-atcsolutions.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))id 1FnIGS-0006pr-00for <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:49:17 +0100 Received: from hagrid.bear-cave.org.uk ([192.168.1.1])by fluffy.bear-cave.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian))id 1FnIGR-0002Fr-ESfor <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:49:15 +0100 Received: from jim by hagrid.bear-cave.org.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1(Debian)) id 1FnIGR-0000rO-00for <anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]>; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:49:15 +0100 X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3uoHReh/ysOhvlFXOYM3nmtcjtaxkjk8k= Return-Path: <jim-RlTlQ/[email protected]> Delivered-To: mailman-anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <2791ac1b0606021013r717c7973i829769b73e0a09f2-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org><2791ac1b0606021154o4efed9cahe59784dc461ae4c8-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org><[email protected]> X-Face: #e_3/{lz7I8PY]c%cr|7\sfMTD|Ar*F0e~U%InA`aG0^}hG2hT`H9Lr=R?Nl,9-cP)_o}B NDAB"m_&V"ntfjv%6q30^]Q\<YL5[mLMi"X_qm`eA^AA?-SC>NTny77`@0?P@FpO{b*dM4 09XvO$kmP[~W=-Cm~|#49QE;@'K}LGK}??aD=>|x=B:n6"`}!9FIrtfOx%`hTC5#VFORlu PrtN_#-_6b,Cu^NF|:D=97AFz(mw=K X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on caladin.urbancode.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61 X-BeenThere: anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: Anthill user list <anthill.lists.urbancode.com> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.urbancode.com/pipermail/anthill> List-Post: <mailto:anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill>,<mailto:anthill-request-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected]?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: anthill-bounces-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2006 16:49:42.0432 (UTC) FILETIME=[0AE20200:01C688C0] On Friday 2 June 2006 22:48, gnugy wrote: > Are you by any chance using the SubversionRepositoryAdapter? If you are > I had the same problem a few months back that boiled down to a problem with > a regular expression in the getRevisionsSince() method. This problem is also fixed in the latest Anthill OS release. -- Jim Hague - [email protected] Never trust a computer you can't lift. _______________________________________________ Anthill mailing list Anthill-IWHQxnLZ/[email protected] http://lists.urbancode.com/mailman/listinfo/anthill _________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement