Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] tracing to the console
"Alex" <alex-he/e8N7AIe/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think so, but for Java 1.3 and 1.4 it will pby ignore java.lang.ClassLoader, URLClassLoader etc, so you might miss some part since a user can use new URLClassLoader() directly. Else just hotswap it by hand at the beginning of your app. There should be a way if you need it. Alex ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eugene Kuleshov" <eu-E/[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:27 PM Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] tracing to the console > Alex wrote: > > > Sure, this one should work fine to intercept user hacked ClassLoader > > subclasses. > > Sorry for bugging this, but can it be done using online mode only without > precompilation? > > regards, > Eugene > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Eugene Kuleshov" <eu-E/[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] tracing to the console > > > > > > > >>Alex, Jonas, > >> > >> That all is godd to know but it is all AW internals. What I'm looking > > > > for > > > >>is to bind and advice to the following pointcut > >> > >> execution(* java.lang.ClassLoader+.new(..)) > >> > >> It will be ok to do not have advice at the very top class loader. > >> > >> regards, > >> Eugene > >> > >>>Exact > >>>There is indeed some ways to alter the java.lang.ClassLoader as well > > with > >>>JVMTI, but then it makes things complex to support offline deployments. > >>>Alex > >