Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] stack overflow in cvs head
christoph sturm <chrisml-Ws/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
thanks jonas, works great. On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:54:53 +0100, Jonas Boner <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, try to update now. I think I have fixed it. Let me know. > > /Jonas > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Christoph Sturm [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:38 PM > > To: Jonas Boner > > Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] stack overflow in cvs head > > > > hey jonas! > > > > matching mixins on annotations doesnt work for me in beta1. > > this: > > /** > > * @Introduce within(@Perst *..*) > > */ > > > > produces: > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.exception.DefinitionException: > > expression is not well-formed [within(@Perst*..*)]: > > > > and cvs HEAD produces the stack overflow even without any > > aspects. It seems that it builds a registry of all loaded > > classes at load time even when there are no aspects. > > > > regards > > chris > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:13:10 +0100, Jonas Boner > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dammit. > > > This is odd. > > > > > > You mean that you are sure that NO pointcuts are defined. > > This means > > > that NO classes should be instrumented, but your message is > > that they > > > are? > > > > > > What features do you need that is in HEAD now? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Christoph Sturm [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:06 PM > > > > To: Jonas Boner > > > > Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] stack overflow in cvs head > > > > > > > > yeah, it happens with latest HEAD. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 12:02:46 +0100, Jonas Boner <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > What is the date of the HEAD are you using? > > > > > Have you tried latest? > > > > > > > > > > /Jonas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: christoph sturm [mailto:chrisml-Ws/[email protected]] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:55 AM > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Cc: Jonas Boner > > > > > > Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] stack overflow in cvs head > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.0beta1 works. the problem is just that theres other > > > > stuff in cvs > > > > > > head that i need. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > chris > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:38:37 +0100, Jonas Boner > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > You said it is on HEAD? > > > > > > > Does it happen on 1.0beta1? > > > > > > > - Jonas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: christoph sturm [mailto:chrisml-Ws/[email protected]] > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:03 AM > > To: > > > > > > [email protected] > > Cc: Jonas Boner > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] stack overflow in cvs head > > > > > > > > > > hey jonas! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this happens even without any defined aspects, just by > > > > > > > > running the class in AW online mode (-Xaspectwerkz) > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 08:43:11 +0100, Jonas Boner > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Great that you found the bug. I will look into this. > > > > > > > > > Which pointcuts are you using and together with > > > > which advices? > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Jonas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: > > > > christoph sturm > > > > > > [mailto:chrisml-Ws/[email protected]] > > > > Sent: > > Sunday, July 18, > > > > > > 2004 9:30 PM > > To: > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: > > > > > > > > [aspectwerkz-dev] stack overflow in cvs head > > > > > > > > hey > > > > > > > > > > > > i have now isolated the problem further, and > > > > found a > > > > > > > > really > > easy way to reproduce it: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this class: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public class Guess { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public Guess(Guess no) { > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static public void main(String[] args) { > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > also produces a stacktrace when its preprocessed. > > > > > > > > > > so i think that the preprocessor fails if a > > > > class has no > > > > > > > > > > default constructor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:37:12 +0200, christoph > > > > sturm > > > > > > > > > > <chrisml-Ws/[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > hi alex! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i was just running a jmock based mock testsuite. > > > > > > > > jmock > > uses cglib to > > > create mockobjects. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this test fails here: > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > package com.schaumwelt.aspects; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > import org.jmock.cglib.MockObjectTestCase; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > import java.util.Date; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > public class AspectwerkzTest extends > > > > MockObjectTestCase > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > public void testNothing() > > > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > mock(Date.class); > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > you just need jmock 1.0.1 binary > > > > distribution, cglib > > > > > > > > 2.0 > > is included. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thx > > > > > > > > > > > chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:47:57 -0500 (CDT), Alex > > > > > > > > > > <alex-he/e8N7AIe/[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you think I can reproduce it,just by > > > > adding > > > > > > > > some > > aspect on the > > cglib > > > > code base, > > > > or > > did > > > > > > you have it when running Hibernate or > > > > > > > > something ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I need to know if you had it out of the > > > > box or for > > > > > > > > on the fly > > generated > > > > classes. > > > > > > > > > > > > May be you can guess it from the names > > > > printed out > > > > > > > > > > there if you are > > > > familiar with cglib. > > > > > > > > > > > > (net.sf.cglib.core.Block, > > > > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.EmitUtils$12 etc) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > hi all! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > aw3 cvs head produces stack overflow > > > > exceptions > > > > > > > > since > > yesterday > > > evening: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > AspectWerkz - WARN - Error > > > > pre-processing class > > > > > > > > > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.ClassEmitter in > > > > > > > > Thread[main,5,main] > > > > > > > > > java.lang.StackOverflowError > > > > > > > > > > > > > AspectWerkz - WARN - Error pre-processing > > > > class > > > > > > > > > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.CodeEmitter in > > > > > > Thread[main,5,main] > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.StackOverflowError > > > > > > > > > > > AspectWerkz > > > > > > - WARN - Error pre-processing class > > > > > > > > > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.RemappingCodeVisitor > > > > > > in > > Thread[main,5,main] > > > > > > > > > java.lang.StackOverflowError > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock.<init>(ReferenceQueue.java:36) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock.<init>(ReferenceQueue.java:36) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.<init>(ReferenceQueue.java:37) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > java.util.WeakHashMap.<init>(WeakHashMap.java:151) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.reflect.impl.javassist.JavassistClass > > > > > > > > > > Info.<init>(JavassistClassInfo.java:148) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.reflect.impl.javassist.JavassistClass > > > > > > > > > > Info.getClassInfo(JavassistClassInfo.java:182) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.reflect.impl.javassist.JavassistCodeI > > > > > > > > > > nfo.getParameterTypes(JavassistCodeInfo.java:62) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.reflect.impl.javassist.JavassistConst > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ructorInfo.addAnnotations(JavassistConstructorInfo.java:134) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.reflect.impl.javassist.JavassistConst > > > > > > > > > > ructorInfo.<init>(JavassistConstructorInfo.java:40) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.reflect.impl.javassist.JavassistClass > > > > > > > > > > Info.<init>(JavassistClassInfo.java:148) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.reflect.impl.javassist.JavassistClass > > > > > > > > > > Info.getClassInfo(JavassistClassInfo.java:182) > > > > > > > > > > > > > at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.codehaus.aspectwerkz.reflect.impl.javassist.JavassistCodeI > > > > > > > > > > nfo.getParameterTypes(JavassistCodeInfo.java:62) > > > > > > > > > > > > > AspectWerkz - WARN - Error > > > > pre-processing class > > > > > > > > > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.EmitUtils$12 in > > > > > > > > Thread[main,5,main] > > > > > > > > > java.lang.StackOverflowError > > > > > > > > > > > > > AspectWerkz - WARN - Error pre-processing > > > > class > > > > > > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.Block > > > > > in > > > > > > Thread[main,5,main] > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.StackOverflowError > > > > > > > > > > > AspectWerkz > > > > > > - WARN - Error pre-processing class > > > > > > > > > > > > > net.sf.cglib.reflect.FastClassEmitter$4 in > > > > > > Thread[main,5,main] > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.StackOverflowError > > > > > > > > > > > > > AspectWerkz - WARN - Error pre-processing class > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > net.sf.cglib.core.EmitUtils$16 in > > > > > > Thread[main,5,main] > > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.StackOverflowError > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe this has somethig to do with > > cglib. I have > > > > > > actually > > > > > > no idea > > > why aw > > > > > > > > > > > > > wants to pre process the cglib classes, > > > > > > because i > > have > > only no > > caller > > > > > > > side > > > > > > pointcuts, and all my > > pointcuts use annotations, > > > > > > > > and the cglib > > > > > > > classes arent annotated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > -- > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > [email protected] > > > -- -- [email protected]