Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] : new version
Jonas Bonér <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:52:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
AspectWerkzC is for offline post-compilation. Why would you use an Ant task to start up your application? (You are might getting confused by the aspectwerkz.bat script?) /Jonas On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:46:28 +0300, the_mindstorm <[email protected]> wrote: > Quote [Jonas Bonér]: > > Hey. > > > > On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:59:52 +0300, the_mindstorm > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Quote [Jonas Bonér]: > >> > Hi. > >> > > >> > thanks a lot for your contributions, I like it. committed to head. > >> > >> 10x > >> > >> > I was just wondering if it would be more intuitive to use 'classpath' > >> > instead of 'cls' or 'clsdir' and to use 'srcdir' and not 'src'. > >> > >> +1 for classpath. > >> As for src vs srcdir I have used the notations according to Ant provided tasks (see javac). I think > >> for the moment we can keep the attribute name srcdir and inner element src. > >> > > > > Fine with me. > > > >> > > >> > Ps. We are in high need of an ant task for the offline compiler > >> > (AspectWerkzC) as well, > > Why are you talking only about offline mode? This task cannot be used also for classload weaving? > > ./the_mindstorm >