Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] : new version

Jonas Bonér <[email protected]> Thu, 7 Oct 2004 18:52:26 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
AspectWerkzC is for offline post-compilation.
Why would you use an Ant task to start up your application?
(You are might getting confused by the aspectwerkz.bat script?)

/Jonas


On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:46:28 +0300, the_mindstorm
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Quote [Jonas Bonér]:
> > Hey.
> >
> > On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:59:52 +0300, the_mindstorm
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Quote [Jonas Bonér]:
> >> > Hi.
> >> >
> >> > thanks a lot for your contributions, I like it. committed to head.
> >>
> >> 10x
> >>
> >> > I was just wondering if it would be more intuitive to use 'classpath'
> >> > instead of 'cls' or 'clsdir' and to use 'srcdir' and not 'src'.
> >>
> >> +1 for classpath.
> >> As for src vs srcdir I have used the notations according to Ant provided tasks (see javac). I think
> >> for the moment we can keep the attribute name srcdir and inner element src.
> >>
> >
> > Fine with me.
> >
> >> >
> >> > Ps. We are in high need of an ant task for the offline compiler
> >> > (AspectWerkzC) as well,
> 
> Why are you talking only about offline mode? This task cannot be used also for classload weaving?
> 
> ./the_mindstorm
>