[Fwd: Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] : new version]

Quote [Jonas Bonér]:

> AspectWerkzC is for offline post-compilation.
> Why would you use an Ant task to start up your application?
> (You are might getting confused by the aspectwerkz.bat script?)
> 

Yes indeed I was looking at aspectwerkz.bat. Everything is started using AspectWerkzC. So I thought
that for project development using Ant it would be nice to have it there. Pls correct me if I am far
way :-).

./the_mindstorm

> /Jonas
> 
> 
> On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:46:28 +0300, the_mindstorm
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Quote [Jonas Bonér]:
>> > Hey.
>> >
>> > On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:59:52 +0300, the_mindstorm
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Quote [Jonas Bonér]:
>> >> > Hi.
>> >> >
>> >> > thanks a lot for your contributions, I like it. committed to head.
>> >>
>> >> 10x
>> >>
>> >> > I was just wondering if it would be more intuitive to use 'classpath'
>> >> > instead of 'cls' or 'clsdir' and to use 'srcdir' and not 'src'.
>> >>
>> >> +1 for classpath.
>> >> As for src vs srcdir I have used the notations according to Ant provided tasks (see javac). I think
>> >> for the moment we can keep the attribute name srcdir and inner element src.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Fine with me.
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Ps. We are in high need of an ant task for the offline compiler
>> >> > (AspectWerkzC) as well,
>> 
>> Why are you talking only about offline mode? This task cannot be used also for classload weaving?
>> 
>> ./the_mindstorm
>>
>