Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] Ant task

xdocs are done
wouldn't you like to focus on some new stuff like this javadoc stuff ?
(thanks for reminding me that i had commented it out - it is fixed in
branch_1_0)



On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:03:04 +0300, the_mindstorm
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Quote [Alexandre Vasseur]:
> 
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > I have integrated and commited Ant task whose initial implementation
> > has been provided by the_mindstorm(at)evolva(dot)ro [thanks].
> > If any of you is about to write some contribution, it can be wise to
> > follow our guidelines
> > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/AW/Check+in+criterias
> >
> > If you check out branch_1_0, when using
> > -Daspectwerkz.transform.verbose=true, a lot more information about the
> > pointcut that match will be printed on stdout. Let us know asap if you
> > would like to have this option in a "veryverbose style" that is if you
> > were used to letting the verbose mode to true (and now are concerned
> > by having to much information printed out).
> >
> > Alex
> > 
> I liked the idea with the pattern for resource copy. Very neat.
> I am sorry that I didn't conform to the quoted guidelines (sometimes my memories play tricks on me).
> I will try commenting the source and the xdoc comments are almost done.
> 
> I have also a question: why the real call to AnnotationC is commented?
> 
> ./the_mindstorm
>