Re: [aspectwerkz-dev] Ant task

Quote [Alexandre Vasseur]:

> xdocs are done

Where and what name has the xdoc?

./the_mindstorm

> wouldn't you like to focus on some new stuff like this javadoc stuff ?
> (thanks for reminding me that i had commented it out - it is fixed in
> branch_1_0)
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:03:04 +0300, the_mindstorm
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Quote [Alexandre Vasseur]:
>> 
>> 
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I have integrated and commited Ant task whose initial implementation
>> > has been provided by the_mindstorm(at)evolva(dot)ro [thanks].
>> > If any of you is about to write some contribution, it can be wise to
>> > follow our guidelines
>> > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/AW/Check+in+criterias
>> >
>> > If you check out branch_1_0, when using
>> > -Daspectwerkz.transform.verbose=true, a lot more information about the
>> > pointcut that match will be printed on stdout. Let us know asap if you
>> > would like to have this option in a "veryverbose style" that is if you
>> > were used to letting the verbose mode to true (and now are concerned
>> > by having to much information printed out).
>> >
>> > Alex
>> > 
>> I liked the idea with the pattern for resource copy. Very neat.
>> I am sorry that I didn't conform to the quoted guidelines (sometimes my memories play tricks on me).
>> I will try commenting the source and the xdoc comments are almost done.
>> 
>> I have also a question: why the real call to AnnotationC is commented?
>> 
>> ./the_mindstorm
>>
>