[aspectwerkz-dev] [jira] Deleted: (AW-149) 0.10 RC1 - Model1 not supported?

"[email protected] (JIRA)" <jira-yCVjj/[email protected]> Fri, 3 Aug 2007 07:11:56 +1000 (EST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
     [ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/AW-149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

[email protected] deleted AW-149:
---------------------------------


> 0.10 RC1 - Model1 not supported?
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AW-149
>                 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/AW-149
>             Project: AspectWerkz
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: Win2K
>            Reporter: shivshanker shenoy
>
> This is my first post to AspectWerkz and I hope this is the right place to put what I have in mind with regarding 0.10 RC1 release.
> I took up to AspectWerkz (mainly because it has static aspecti-zation) last week. I downloaded 0.9 version and ran throught samples. 
> We used model 1(xmldef) and found the Introduction feature really cool one. The non-coupling of the interface and implementation class, and the flexibility to have any implementation class with a change of value in aspectwerkz.xml - was a big hit with us.
> Last night we downloaded version 0.10Rc1 and found that it does not have 'xmldef' and 'attribdef' packages. Also that the site as well as downloaded bundle did not have model1 examples. And with model2, for Introduction, user has to write implementation class as a public inner class in the Aspect. I guess this takes away the flexibility that model1 provided.
> So now,
> 1. The implementation class is coupled with an Aspect class.
> 2. The implementation class can not be used as a simple POJO anywhere else in the application (if need be).
> 3. to switch between implementation class, either a new aspect needs to be written or the inner class in the aspect needs to be replaced with the new impl class code.
> Does the changes in 0.10RC1 mean that model 1 (xmldef) is not going to be supported here onwards (Change feature section does not mention anything related to model1 being discontinued)?
> Or is there some workaround for the Introduction problem mentioned above?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email