Re: RE: [aspectwerkz-commit] [CVS aspectwerkz] added

Dear all

There are indeed plans to support Javassist instead of Bcel. Some work has already started in that direction in a CVS branch, and I have also a prototype work as regards redefinition of joinpoints at runtime that is using Javassist.
We will do perfomance measurement as regards Javassist, and we might in the future switch again in favor of ASM, again based on performance measurement.

Currently our main objective is to increase the feature scope, and we think Javassist can help to achieve this in the shortest time.
AspectWerkz has always been designed to be bytecode kit independant, and the use of the hooking part in cglib thus with ASM is an evidence of this reality.

Any input on these bytecode kits are welcome.

Alex


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Vincent Massol 
  To: aspectwerkz-devel-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org 
  Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 3:03 PM
  Subject: [aspectwerkz-devel] RE: [aspectwerkz-commit] [CVS aspectwerkz] added


  Alex,



  Does it mean that AW is dropping BCEL in favor of Javassist and that users of 0.9 RC2 will need to replace BCEL by Javassist?



  Thanks

  -Vincent



  -----Original Message-----
  From: aspectwerkz-commit-admin-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org [mailto:aspectwerkz-commit-admin-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of avasseur-yCVjj/[email protected]
  Sent: 25 January 2004 15:15
  To: aspectwerkz-commit-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org
  Subject: [aspectwerkz-commit] [CVS aspectwerkz] added



        Commit in aspectwerkz/lib on b_20030123_javassist
       
        javassist-2.6.jar
       [binary]
       added 1.1.2.1
       

 added_______________________________________________ aspectwerkz-commit mailing list aspectwerkz-commit-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectwerkz-commit