Re: [aspectwerkz-devel] Re: Throwing a checked Exception

Jonas "Bon?r" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.user,gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Michael. 

Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. Things have been very hectic on my side.

Thanks for finding the problem yourself. It is of course a bug. This should NOT be the behaviour. 
I'll fix this in the next following days, at the latest on monday.

Thanks.
/Jonas

--- Michael Nascimento Santos <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just found DefaultAdviceContainerStrategy is to blame in my case. It is the
> class wrapping checked exceptions. Is this really the intended behaviour? Or
> is it a bug?
> 
> Regards,
> Michael
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Michael Nascimento Santos" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 1:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-user] Throwing a checked Exception
> 
> 
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I managed to do it by implementing my own JoinPointController. However, I
> > don't like the way it's now since I had to give up using self-defined
> > aspects and now have to extend an AroundAdvice and do all the xml
> > configuration.
> >
> > Isn't there an easy way to achieve what I originally wanted? Do I really
> > have to implement my own JoinPointController (of course I extended
> > DefaultJoinPointController, but even so...)? Do I have to abandon model 2
> > completely?
> >
> > []s
> > Michael
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Michael Nascimento Santos" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:27 PM
> > Subject: [aspectwerkz-user] Throwing a checked Exception
> >
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I've written an around advice that might decide to throw a checked
> > exception
> > > that is declared in the signature of the method being advised. However,
> > when
> > > it throws it, I get a WrappedRuntimeException in my code! I need to get
> > the
> > > original exception, provided it was part of the original method
> signature.
> > > How can I do that? This is crucial to what I am trying to do.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Michael
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectwerkz-user mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectwerkz-user
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectwerkz-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectwerkz-user
> >
> _______________________________________________
> aspectwerkz-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectwerkz-devel


=====
Jonas 
http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/jboner/

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.