Re: Change versions in build.xml and project.xml?
Jonas Bonér <jonas-yCVjj/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I completely agree with you Vincent. We have not handled this well. I do think that 0.10 should perhaps be 1.0. All your knowledge and feedback is very welcome. Thanks. /Jonas Vincent Massol wrote: > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: aspectwerkz-devel-admin-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org [mailto:aspectwerkz- >>[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alex >>Sent: 06 March 2004 19:12 >>To: aspectwerkz-devel-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org >>Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-devel] Change versions in build.xml and >>project.xml? >> >>the 0.10 is in aspectwerkz2 cvs module and what you described should >> >> >be in > > >>place (0.10.RC1) >> >> > >ok, will checkout aspectwerkz2. > ><rant> >hmmm... ok, so HEAD is dead? i.e. there's no more development at all on >it, not even bug fixes? If so, it should have a version of 0.9.1dev or >something like that... ;-). > >Anyway, so it means that 0.10 is a major change, right? I guess that's >why it was developed on a branch (as the usual practice is to have the >latest version on HEAD and bug fixes on a branch). > >BTW, I find that having 0.x versions is very misleading. It's supposed >to mean that it's not stable yet. So it's supposed to say to people: >don't use this version in any serious work. But the problem is that when >a framework stays in 0.x state for long and when that framework is >useful (as AW is!) and there's lots of advertising for it (as there is >for AW), then 0.x doesn't mean anything anymore and you'll end up anyway >with users very angry if you break seriously some APIs. So I guess AW >0.9 is equivalent to a 1.x version and 0.10 is equivalent to a 2.x >one... :-) That's probably why the branch is called aspectwerkz2 ;-) ></rant> > >Thanks Alex and don't be concerned about my rant. It's not addressed at >AW in particular. It's just that I see so many frameworks in the java >open source world doing this that I am a bit tired with this strategy... >:-) > >Thanks >-Vincent > > > >>Alex >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Vincent Massol" <[email protected]> >>To: <aspectwerkz-devel-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> >>Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 5:38 PM >>Subject: [aspectwerkz-devel] Change versions in build.xml and >> >> >project.xml? > > >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I remember pointing this out some time ago but I did not get any >>>response from you guys. >>> >>>I have done an update a CVS update of the aspectwerkz module and if >>> >>> >I > > >>>build it, it will generate 0.9 libraries. This is obviously wrong as >>> >>> >the > > >>>version should be 0.10dev (or 0.10-SNAPSHOT, or whatever convention >>>you'd like to use). >>> >>>Don't you think it would be a good idea to modify build.xml and >>>project.xml to use 0.10dev instead of 0.9? >>> >>>Thanks >>>-Vincent >>> >>> > > >_______________________________________________ >aspectwerkz-devel mailing list >aspectwerkz-devel-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org >http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectwerkz-devel > > >