Re: Change versions in build.xml and project.xml?

Jonas Bonér <jonas-yCVjj/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I completely agree with you Vincent.
We have not handled this well.
I do think that 0.10 should perhaps be 1.0.

All your knowledge and feedback is very welcome.
Thanks.

/Jonas

Vincent Massol wrote:

>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: aspectwerkz-devel-admin-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org [mailto:aspectwerkz-
>>[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alex
>>Sent: 06 March 2004 19:12
>>To: aspectwerkz-devel-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org
>>Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-devel] Change versions in build.xml and
>>project.xml?
>>
>>the 0.10 is in aspectwerkz2 cvs module and what you described should
>>    
>>
>be in
>  
>
>>place (0.10.RC1)
>>    
>>
>
>ok, will checkout aspectwerkz2.
>
><rant>
>hmmm... ok, so HEAD is dead? i.e. there's no more development at all on
>it, not even bug fixes? If so, it should have a version of 0.9.1dev or
>something like that... ;-).
>
>Anyway, so it means that 0.10 is a major change, right? I guess that's
>why it was developed on a branch (as the usual practice is to have the
>latest version on HEAD and bug fixes on a branch).
>
>BTW, I find that having 0.x versions is very misleading. It's supposed
>to mean that it's not stable yet. So it's supposed to say to people:
>don't use this version in any serious work. But the problem is that when
>a framework stays in 0.x state for long and when that framework is
>useful (as AW is!) and there's lots of advertising for it (as there is
>for AW), then 0.x doesn't mean anything anymore and you'll end up anyway
>with users very angry if you break seriously some APIs. So I guess AW
>0.9 is equivalent to a 1.x version and 0.10 is equivalent to a 2.x
>one... :-) That's probably why the branch is called aspectwerkz2 ;-)
></rant>
>
>Thanks Alex and don't be concerned about my rant. It's not addressed at
>AW in particular. It's just that I see so many frameworks in the java
>open source world doing this that I am a bit tired with this strategy...
>:-)
>
>Thanks
>-Vincent
>
>  
>
>>Alex
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Vincent Massol" <[email protected]>
>>To: <aspectwerkz-devel-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
>>Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 5:38 PM
>>Subject: [aspectwerkz-devel] Change versions in build.xml and
>>    
>>
>project.xml?
>  
>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I remember pointing this out some time ago but I did not get any
>>>response from you guys.
>>>
>>>I have done an update a CVS update of the aspectwerkz module and if
>>>      
>>>
>I
>  
>
>>>build it, it will generate 0.9 libraries. This is obviously wrong as
>>>      
>>>
>the
>  
>
>>>version should be 0.10dev (or 0.10-SNAPSHOT, or whatever convention
>>>you'd like to use).
>>>
>>>Don't you think it would be a good idea to modify build.xml and
>>>project.xml to use 0.10dev instead of 0.9?
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>-Vincent
>>>      
>>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>aspectwerkz-devel mailing list
>aspectwerkz-devel-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org
>http://lists.codehaus.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectwerkz-devel
>
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.