RE: AWare
"Jonas Boner" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----Original Message----- From: Jérôme BERNARD [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tue 4/27/2004 8:12 PM To: Jonas Boner Cc: aspectwerkz-devel-81qHHgoATdGxIXFVlbCvtR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-devel] AWare Jonas Boner wrote: >Great news Jerome. :-) > >I'll discuss with the hausmates if the community thinks that codehaus is the proper place for this kind of project (I can't take that decision myself). After that I guess I have to put some effort into putting my stuff in :-) > > Oki doki. Perhaps codehaus supports sub-projects (à la java.net)? I'll check. What about the namespace for the classes? What do you think is best to do? Can we wait with this a couple of days? I'll keep working on the unit-tests so that they cover as much code as possible. Great. This should be a criteria for check-in. Next, I will probably start to write some doc somewhere on how to use it. BTW what would be the best format for it? xdoc? sdocbook? AspectWerkz uses xdoc. Personally I am fond of docbook, but that is more complex. We need a format that can be easily used by any user. I guess xdoc is better. Another alt. would be the confluence wiki. What do you think? /Jonas Jérôme.