Re: [aspectwerkz-user] RE: FW: Pointcut issue
Alexandru Popescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [quote [email protected]::on 3/23/2005 5:14 PM] > If I refer the annotation using a wrong name, add another method won't make > it work. > > I'm pretty sure this is an existing bug, I guess I have to drop it from our > project for now. > > Thanks > Leon > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Vasseur [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:34 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: FW: Pointcut issue > > so we can see the DoNotAdvise is compiled by AnnotationC > you probably refer to it using a wrong name (full qualified name, etc) > it depens on what you have in your annotatoin.properties > > since you are using a sample as a code base, you should start from > there and trying to stay as close as possible to it > Alex > > > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:22:45 -0500, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Alext, >> >> Attached is the result using -verbose and -details options. >> >> If I have beforeA method, it finds some matches, otherwise, it doesn't. >> >> Your help is greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks >> Leon >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alexandre Vasseur [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:08 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: FW: Pointcut issue >> >> tyr using -verbose for AnnotationC, see if you have your annotation there >> then use -verbose -details with -offline to see what match / does not > match >> >> Alex >> >> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:02:47 -0500, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Alex, >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks a million for the quick response. >> > >> > >> > >> > I attached the steps I used to compile and run the code with Sun JDK >> 1.4.2. >> > Could you please take a look? >> > >> > >> > >> > I couldn't see your attachment because my company blocks any attachment >> with >> > extensions like .zip, .jsp etc. >> > >> > >> > >> > Could you please rename your attachment with extension .txt so that I > can >> > receive it? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Leon >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Alexandre Vasseur [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 8:44 AM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: FW: Pointcut issue >> > >> > >> > >> > just work with Java 5 so I suspect an issue in your AnnotationC steps. >> > >> > see attached >> > >> > Alex >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:31:12 -0500, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Alex, >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Can you help me out on the following question I asked yesterday? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks a lot, >> > >> > > Leon >> > >> > > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > >> > > From: Liu, Leon >> > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:26 PM >> > >> > > To: '[email protected]' >> > >> > > Subject: Pointcut issue >> > >> > > >> > >> > > All, >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Attached is an example downloaded from aspectwerkz website with slight >> > >> > > modification. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > The code defines two advices aroundB and beforeA, it works as > expected. >> > But >> > >> > > If I remove method beforeA, it doesn't work anymore (methods in class >> > Target >> > >> > > won't be weaved). I think this is a bug of aspectwerks 2.0 final. can >> > >> > > anybody shed some light? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks >> > >> > > Leon >> > >> > > >> > >> > > ----------------------------------------- >> > >> > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the >> > >> > > addressee and may contain information that is privileged and >> confidential. >> > >> > > If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an >> > authorized >> > >> > > representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >> any >> > >> > > dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > have >> > >> > > received this communication in error, notify the sender immediately by >> > >> > > return email and delete the message and any attachments from your >> system. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > In case you are convinced it is a bug pls send us a short test case that will help us track it down and fix it asap. thanks in advance, - -- :alex |.::the_mindstorm::.| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCQZ09OCPjdDT2FEURAn6VAJ4kQ/Hni6duT+6PLm9wYpKgpl9VnwCfbmyU FZOd7IIr0aiibXXTM5NGQvs= =SOva -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----