RE: [aspectwerkz-user] Speeding up roundtrip
Mattias Jiderhamn <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:11:52 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.aspectwerkz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Interresting. Is this something you would like to share? Have you also made AspectWerkzC use a different output directory, or do you make a copy of all the (modified) class files first, so that you don't have to recompile all classes next time? At 2005-06-21 15:13, you wrote: >We had the same issue. Our codebase is really >big. So, what I did was to override the "javac" >ANT task to write the file list to a text file. >Since javac already checks for the timestamps, >it only compiles the modified classes. This way >I have a list of only modified classes. I then >extended the AspectwerkzCTask to read the files >from this text file and AOP compile them. This >way I don't have to weave the whole codebase evrytime. > >Regards >Atif Khan > >-----Original Message----- >From: Alexandre Vasseur >[<mailto:[email protected]>mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 7:04 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [aspectwerkz-user] Speeding up roundtrip > >Hi > >You perhaps need to see how the matching is done >using -Daspectwerkz.transform.details=true >That may help to narrow call side (call/get/set) >pointcuts f.e. One such pointcut can indeed >sometime lead to parsing everry single bytecode instruction. > >Aside you may use include/exclude element in >your aop.xm if you know that some files will not be weaved at all. > >AspectWerkzC does not support writing to a different location. >On the other hand you may be able to implement a >wrapper that checks for .class file timestamps >to compile only modified files (then keep track >of the lastRun timestamp in some per project file) > >Alex > >On 6/21/05, Mattias Jiderhamn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Our application is big enough to require a few minutes of offline > > weaving on my machine, so we use online weaving in development. On the > > other hand, reloading the application in the web container using > > online weaving isn't much better (say ½-1 minute). This makes > > developing very slow, since the code-compile-test cycle has a lot of > > weaving overhead. > > > > Is there any better way to do this? Can I have AspectWerkz weave only > > modified classes offline? > > If I weave the whole project and then try to compile in my IDE > > (IntelliJ), I get compiler errors. Could I make AspectWerkzC output > > the weaved files in a different directory, so that I can compile from > > the IDE and then have AspectWerkz weave the modified classes only? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Mattias Jiderhamn > > > > > >**************************************************************************** >This email and any attachments hereto contain >confidential and/or privileged information. This >information is intended solely for the >individual or entity named herein. If the reader >of this email is not the intended recipient, you >are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, >storage, dissemination, or duplication of this >communication is strictly prohibited.If you have >received this communication in error, please >notify the sender immediately by telephone - +65 >63956166, or by return e-mail, and delete the >message from your computer. As the intended >recipient, you acknowledge that emails >transmitted over the World Wide Web may be >subject to hacking or unauthorised >interferences. If in doubt as to the form in >which this message was originally transmitted, >please verify directly with the writer. > >***************************************************************************