Re: [aspectwerkz-user] JavaOne session on "practical application of aspects"

Hi Eugene

Any links to some sample or doc would be welcome. I am not sure what
you are talking about.
SpringAOP can match on annotation - hopefully this is what is used for
their Java 5 @Transactional attribute. Did the slides let you think
the opposite ? You may have been confused between annnotation-defined
aspect (use annotations to define Aspect: AspectWerkz (hence AspectJ
5), Jboss), and annotation-driven AOP (match on annotaitons: all)

Aside, this is achievable since a while by using the AspectWerkz
pointcut grammar and plugin it into Spring :
http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/avasseur/archives/000961_spring_pointcut_on_steroids.html
Soon, you'll find the same with AspectJ by the way.

Alex

On 7/11/05, Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>    Just for the record. Spring also have some support for
> annotation-driven aspects.
> 
>    regards,
>    Eugene
> 
> 
> Alexandre Vasseur wrote:
> > You may find these slides and code source interesting (introduction on
> > AOP, AspectJ, AspectWerkz and others mentionned, with key differences
> > explained)
> >
> > http://ryandaigle.com/pebble/2005/06/29/1120071586094.html
> > From a JavaOne 05 BOF that took place 2 weeks ago, by Ryan Daigle
> >
> > Alex
> 
>