Re: [aspectwerkz-user] how to do this?

As I said on the previous message, I already tried that pointcut, and nothing gets intercepted, not the toString() methods, nor any other one. It seemed the logical thing to do, and so I was perplexed it didn't work.
Please do try it yourself on some example. I'd like to know if it is just happening to me.


Thanks


Jonas Bon�r <[email protected]> wrote: Try this pointcut:

 execution(* *..*.*(..)) AND !execution(* *..*.toString()) AND
within(com.bla..*)

/Jonas

On 3/19/06, Manuel  wrote:
>
>  Hello again,
>  Yes, I indeed tried that expression, I think it's the first thing I tried,
> and it results in nothing being intercepted at all. It seems the negation
> cancels out the first expression completely.
>
>  Thanks for the link, but that's actually my usual reference :)
>
>  cheers
>
>
>
> [email protected] wrote:
>  Hello Manuel,
>
> thanks for your mail.
>
> I can't test this at the moment because I have no aspectwerkz installed on
> my private computer, but have you already tried an expression like
>  ?
>
> Perhaps you can find further interesting information on
> http://aspectwerkz.codehaus.org/definition_issues.html
>
> Sunny Sunday
>
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
>
> Viel oder wenig? Schnell oder langsam? Unbegrenzt surfen + telefonieren
> ohne Zeit- und Volumenbegrenzung? DAS TOP ANGEBOT JETZT bei Arcor: günstig
> und schnell mit DSL - das All-Inclusive-Paket für clevere Doppel-Sparer,
> nur 44,85 € inkl. DSL- und ISDN-Grundgebühr!
> http://www.arcor.de/rd/emf-dsl-2
>
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>  Yahoo! Mail
>  Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
>
>


--
Jonas Bonér
Terracotta, Inc.

http://jonasboner.com
http://www.terracottatech.com


			
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Mail
 Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.