Re: suppressing checks

Re 1 - using the SuppressionFilter it is possible to suppress entire
packages or paths. For example:

  <!-- Suppressions for test code -->
  <suppress checks="ImportControl" files="[/\\]test[/\\]java[/\\]"/>
  <suppress checks="JavadocMethod" files="[/\\]test[/\\]java[/\\]"/>
  <suppress checks="MagicNumber" files="[/\\]test[/\\]java[/\\]"/>

  <!-- Ignore generated code -->
  <suppress checks="." files="[/\\]shared[/\\]bindings[/\\]"/>


On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 00:59, Andy Kriger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
> I have a couple questions about suppressing checks...
> 1) Is it possible to suppress checks for entire packages or paths, or is it
> just file names?
> 2) Is it possible to suppress checks using single-line comments for an
> entire class or must you use block comments?
> 3) Is it possible to use both single-line comments and block comments?
>
> Thank you
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
> royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> Checkstyle-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/checkstyle-user
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects

_______________________________________________
Checkstyle-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/checkstyle-user