Re: ParameterNumber check after an @Override

Hi Ronan,

Very good idea, I really encourage you to submit this as a feature request!=
 You could attach your sources to speed up things a little bit ;-)

Regarding the maintenance of your custom check: It depends on your implemen=
tation how much effort has to be put into maintenance.
Did you implement your custom check as a delegation to the original check? =
I mean something like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delegation_pattern=
#Simple
In that case all updates to the original check would become active in your =
check without the need to build and deliver your custom class again.

Best regards,
Peter Wippermann =


P.S. I find it quite interesting how many users, who publish on this list, =
are actually from the TelCo (or associated) business! :-)
  =


 =

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Ronan DANIELLOU [mailto:[email protected]] =

Gesendet: Freitag, 10. August 2012 17:58
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [Checkstyle-user] ParameterNumber check after an @Override

Hi everyone,

I am using a rule for the parameter number. Nevertheless, I sometimes have =
to override some methods (in Swing, for example). Those methods may have mo=
re parameters than what the rule is configured to allow. I would like this =
rule to be ignored when applied to an overridden method.

Does it make sense? If so, how may I do this? I have looked at suppression =
filters, but they work either with a configuration file (that you need to m=
aintain) or keywords in the code (which makes you add to your files, text f=
or a specific tool).

Trying to write a custom filter, for what I have understood, it seems to al=
low reaching text and the lines of it, but you do not have access to a stru=
cture as you have in a check. I was worried that using some kind of text re=
gexp on a line would be brittle.

Thus I have written a custom check, inheriting from ParameterNumberCheck cl=
ass. This works. But I would have to maintain it in my project locally for =
future checkstyle releases.

Thus, is there another better way to do it?
Do you think this request should become a feature request?

Thanks.

R.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat la=
ndscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will inclu=
de endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. ht=
tp://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Checkstyle-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/checkstyle-user

---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and =

threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions =

will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware =

threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/