RE: compatibility
"Lendvai Attila" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <E12F73E3BF124B45A118F3323DEB4955706C4D@netvisorpdc.intranet.netvisor.hu> |
:: > i think of things like not using nested exceptions, :: > collection enumeration, and probably a lot much more... :: :: Um, could you elaborate? :: :: By nested exception, I assume you mean using the "cause" :: field in exceptions. I agree there - it should be used a lot more. yep, the script errors are hard to trace, for which i'm not used to since working with java. well, except the cryptic ClassNotFound exceptions fo the lame java runtime, that at many places still throws the CNF with the root class instead of it's dependency that was actually not found. :: What do you mean by "collection enumeration"? nothing serious, just that BeanShell has an extra machinery to implement pluggable enumerations so that it works with pre 1.3 vm's. and then i quickly generalized the issue that probably there are a few places like these. which is not a big problem if it works, but i would love to have nested exceptions... :) - 101 ps: the beanshell based ant replacement progresses well. today i will hopefully finish filesets... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click