Re: Closures

Bob,

Closures mean different things to different people.
The more concrete details and use cases you could supply,
the better.

If there is a reasonable way to structure BeanShell so that
there is a core language along with different (often incompatible)
language extensions, then that might be worthwhile.
That is the only way that I can see to possibly accomodate
all of the syntax extensions that people want.

So, what do you mean when you say "closures"?

Thanks,
Curt

Bob Lee wrote:

> Please, please, please add support for closures. They would save on a 
> lot of typing and would make the dynaop configuration a lot more 
> extendable and readable.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
> For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
> or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
> http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
> _______________________________________________
> Beanshell-developers mailing list
> Beanshell-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beanshell-developers





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297