RE: Discussion: Closures
"Shankar Unni" <[email protected]> Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:53:37 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> One possibility would be to use another eval-like method.
> For example, it could be named callable(). It could return a
> closure with a call() method, and the whole thing might map
> to the Java type java.util.concurrent.Callable where
And how is that different from java.lang.Runnable and run()? Oh, I see -
Callable.call() can return an Object, but run is a void run().
The only minor quibble I might have is for the parameter declaration syntax.
Does this not look more natural?:
x = callable() {
foo = someMethod();
bar++;
};
z = callable(foo, bar) {
print(foo);
someMethod(bar);
};
x.call();
z.call(foo,bar);
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl