Re: [Beanshell-dev] Re: Aborting Interpretting
Archie Cobbs <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:54:50 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.beanshell.user,gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Patrick Niemeyer wrote: > implement the job control in the enhancement. We can do this simply by > adding checkpoints in the main loop and control structures of > BeanShell. While we can never guarantee that user code that BeanShell > invokes will do the same, but at least then our scripts will do the > right thing when they have control. (See various previous threads on > this topic). Dumb/ignorant question... could BeanShell use bytecode generation via CGLIB and insert checks at all backward branches? -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * CTO, Awarix * http://www.awarix.com * Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. * ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click