RE: open source license question
"Daniel Leuck" <[email protected]> Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:25:07 -1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Alexey, Open source licensing discussions often spiral into religious wars, but here is my take - I usually use LGPL for projects because it allows the code to be used and enhanced by a wider audience (people working on commercial software.) I don't necessarily care if people using my library are writing unrelated code under a different license, and I don't particularly like the GPLs purist approach. Cheers, Daniel Leuck Ikayzo http://www.ikayzo.com > -----Original Message----- > From: beanshell-developers-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org [mailto:beanshell- > developers-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Alexey Zinger > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 7:57 AM > To: beanshell-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > Subject: [Beanshell-dev] open source license question > > This is directed to anyone who's had some experience with licensing OS > software, particularly BeanShell-based. I've been working on and off on a > personal project of mine -- a Java spreadsheet, which uses BeanShell for > expression evaluation. I originally licensed it under GPL and it hasn't > been > an issue, but I've always gone back and forth in my mind whether it should > be > LGPL, like BeanShell itself. > > I suppose the logical question to ask is what the intentions are behind > the > project. I'm not trying to create a hit, though if some consulting came > out of > it, or I was able to leverage it at work, as I have in the past, I > wouldn't > have a problem with it. It basically grew out of some of my own tinkering, > as > many such projects do I'm sure. Once I saw significant advantages to it, > I > decided to put it out-there, as much to make it useful for others as to > let it > be hosted somewhere where I didn't have to worry it, so I put it on > Sourceforge > under GPL. > > At this time, I'm gearing up to sneak in a few bug fixes and some missing > features and call it an honest 1.0 relese. Seems like a good time to > revisit > the license question. Any recommendations? > > Alexey > 2001 Honda CBR600F4i (CCS) > 1992 Kawasaki EX500 > http://bsheet.sourceforge.net > > > > > __________________________________ > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. > Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > Beanshell-developers mailing list > Beanshell-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beanshell-developers ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php