RE: Project Status???
"Furash Gary" <furashg-sZWokWQQVgMxjvOLE2GS1/[email protected]> Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:32:05 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.beanshell.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A8F90A7E212A1B49A8A9EBF2E5C3E106049FDAAA@mcaosx2.ca.mcao.maricopa.gov> |
Yes. That's what I was getting at. Just 'cause you already solved it doesn't make you special though ;-) -----Original Message----- From: Pat Niemeyer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:31 PM To: Furash Gary Cc: beanshell-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Subject: RE: [Beanshell-dev] Project Status??? > It's still floating around in my head, but some of the most common > requests and questions are "how do I get this nice syntatic sugar that > groovy, perl, etc. whatever offers." > > You can kind of do some of this with commands (this is what we do), > but I wonder if there's some way to offer the facility without > building the sugar into the language. It's still java scripting, but > if there's something odd in your problem domain you can go ahead and set it up. > Operator overloading is a common request (I'm not a big fan of it)... Have you looked at the "domain syntax" proposal that I offered last year? http://www.beanshell.org/BeanShellDialects.html Do you think this might meet your needs? Pat ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click