Re: [castor-dev] Mvn build and Eclipse

Werner Guttmann <[email protected]> Tue, 04 May 2010 09:13:00 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.castor.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Andras,

On 03.05.2010 08:23, Andras Hatvani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Although I'm not an official committer, but within the scope of a
> university course I'm involved in the development and am affected, too
> I'd like to share my thoughts.
> I completely agree that IDE-specific files shouldn't be part of any
> project's source tree, but I also don't like, if one project's modules
> fill half of my workspace.
Same here, but I learned to accept that I might have more than one 
workspace. And indeed, I do have in average three to four workspaces, 
depending on the number of projects I am working on in parallel.

> Whether one decides for the single- or for
> the multi-project method, both require trade-offs:
> - clean and compact workspace vs manual classpath maintenance and
> - automated classpath maintenance vs "polluted" workspace.
> These two factors are which I can think of at first, but I'd be glad to
> see a more complete list of benefits and drawbacks.
> Btw, did anyone already contact the maven mailing list for further
> information?
>
> Andras
>
> On 1 May 2010, at 16:20, Werner Guttmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I'd really like to see .classpath and .project being removed from our
>> SVN repository. I know there's some resistance, so let's use this
>> thread to get an complete overview on any objections.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Werner
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email