Re: Allowing property getters without a "get" prefix on DataObjects

IIRC, EOF/Wonder allowed you to implement NSKeyValueCoding and the
Utilities class would call valueForKey instead of looking up methods/fields
via reflection. Something similar that would allow you to write/generate
your own readProperty method might work for Cayenne.

On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 3:28 PM Maik Musall <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> > Am 25.09.2018 um 16:59 schrieb John Huss <[email protected]>:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:50 AM Maik Musall <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 25.09.2018 um 16:23 schrieb Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]
> >:
> >>>
> >>>> "Should Cayenne by default work without prefixed accessors".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So how about this... Unless someone else steps in by then, let me
> >> brainstorm it with Nikita a couple of weeks from now and see if we can
> do a
> >> DI solution. It is not nearly as involved as it appears.
> >>
> >> I would be very happy about that! :)
> >>
> >> And once that's there, one way to implement a BeanAccessor alternative
> >> could perhaps be one that is tailored towards field-based DataObjects,
> >> accessing the fields directly without using reflection? If possible,
> that
> >> could present another noticable performance win.
> >>
> >
> > FWIW, I would consider this a non-goal since it would bypass the getter
> > method which may have custom logic (like returning a default value or
> > something).
>
> I didn't mean this to become a standard way, but once the DI point is
> there,
> it's easy to rock your own implementation if you know it matches your use
> case.
>
> Maik
>
>