Re: Cayenne Modeler on macOS Monterey
Aristedes Maniatis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.cayenne.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On OSX, I put this into my ~/.profile ---- export JAVA_11_HOME=$(/usr/libexec/java_home -v11) export JAVA_17_HOME=$(/usr/libexec/java_home -v17) alias java11='export JAVA_HOME=$JAVA_11_HOME' alias java17='export JAVA_HOME=$JAVA_17_HOME' ----- Then you can just type java11 And have Java11 as your default for all further commands in that shell. So this works: # java11 # open /Applications/CayenneModeler.app/ Ari On 18/11/21 5:28am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Yeah, when you run it manually from the shell, you select which JDK to use. When you start from Desktop, it depends on the native wrapper logic. > > BTW, just found the Jira and the mailing list discussion: > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2721 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2721> > * https://lists.apache.org/thread/p90898fsbjq6fv2lwvsw6vv1prob5ycr > > Andrus > >> On Nov 17, 2021, at 8:24 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Oh, I meant to mention that the about dialog says it is using OpenJDK 1.8, >> but I suppose I only see that in the JAR version. >> >> I do have JDK 17 installed, so perhaps that is it. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 1:10 PM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> There's an issue with Java 17 and native Modeler components. Nikita is >>> testing a fix. >>> >>> So your problem is likely unrelated to Monterey. >>> >>> Andrus >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 17, 2021, at 7:51 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Has anyone tried running Cayenne Modeler on macOS Monterey? >>>> >>>> I ran, or at least I tried, CM 4.2M3 to look at Lon's issue and CM >>> wouldn't >>>> run. Tried a version I downloaded from the web site and the version I >>> built >>>> previously for the 4.2M3 release cycle. Didn't see any messages in >>>> Console.app, but I didn't try to find other logs. I know the version I >>>> built previously ran on Big Sur at the time, otherwise I wouldn't >>>> have +1'ed it. >>>> >>>> Running the generic JAR works. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> mrg >>> >