Re: JGroups

> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY,
> multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT);
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY,
> multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_DEFAULT);
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.JGROUPS_CONFIG_URL_PROPERTY,
> javaGroupsFile, "");
> if (StringUtils.equals(eventBridgefactory,
> JavaGroupsBridgeFactory.class.getName()))


None of these settings are in the Modeler for quite some time.

> Maybe best to duplicate the constants locally and drop the dependencies? I
> just don't like repeating things...

I'd to avoid such a heavy dependency if all we need is constants, but luckily not an issue anymore.

Andrus 


> On Dec 20, 2021, at 4:00 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Well, I was pulling in cayenne-jgroups primarily to access constants, such
> as:
> 
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY,
> multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT);
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY,
> multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_DEFAULT);
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.JGROUPS_CONFIG_URL_PROPERTY,
> javaGroupsFile, "");
> if (StringUtils.equals(eventBridgefactory,
> JavaGroupsBridgeFactory.class.getName()))
> ...
> 
> If I didn't add JGroupsModule as a DI module it crashed (forget the exact
> reason right now, but I can try it again later). Note: It didn't break ages
> ago when I was using 4.0.B1, but after I updated it to use 4.0.2. When
> using B1 I had access to the constants without needing to provide a JGroups
> dependency.
> 
> Maybe best to duplicate the constants locally and drop the dependencies? I
> just don't like repeating things...
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:37 AM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> FWIW, I was about to suggest removing "cayenne-jgroups" from Cayenne 5.0
>> as an old and unreliable piece of software we don't want to support :)
>> 
>> As far as the Modeler goes it should not depend on JGroups at all. All the
>> events in the Modeler are in-process and can be passed around within the
>> JVM.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>>> On Dec 19, 2021, at 6:35 PM, Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> While getting the JavaFX modeler running again, I was having issues with
>>> JGroups classes/interfaces not being found/defined, so I added version
>> 5.x
>>> to the POM and it didn't work. Then 4.x and it didn't work. Then 3.x and
>> it
>>> didn't work. Then 2.x and it finally worked.
>>> 
>>> Does Cayenne only work with JGroups 2.x? *
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> mrg
>>> 
>>> * I used 2.12.3.Final here...
>> 
>>