Re: Cayenne 5.0 - getting rid of legacy

Code itself is small and easy to maintain, as it doesn't do much. We
just don't have a proper test suit for it and I'm sure not all Cayenne
modules are compatible with OSGI, at least we have some non-unque
packages (partially this would be resolved once we drop bunch of
deprecated modules),
If we keep it as is, is not much of a problem, I just don't like those
parts with unknown state.

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 7:02 PM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 5, 2022, at 2:00 PM, Nikita Timofeev <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Id like to add OSGi support to that removal list as well.
>
> OSGi support was developed in response to a user request (should be somewhere in the mailing list archives). I have no idea if anyone is still using it, and I am generally unclear on the state of OSGi these days. So how hard is it to keep it around?
>
> Andrus



-- 
Best regards,
Nikita Timofeev