Re: Switching from Travis to GitHub Actions

Big +1 for Github Actions. 

That's anecdotal, and may be the consequence of the general maturity of the CI/CD tech and our testing approach, but somehow on GA builds seem way more stable across all the projects I am involved with.

Andrus

> On Nov 11, 2022, at 8:49 AM, Nikita Timofeev <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is just a heads-up. I'll switch our build automation from Travis
> to GitHub Actions soon. This is recomendation from Apache as Travis
> announced end of unlimited OpenSource support [1]
> But I'm personally prefer Actions for quite some time, so I think it's
> a good thing.
> 
> I've already checked Cayenne builds [2] and it's much faster than on Travis.
> 
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=INFRA&title=Travis+Migrations
> [2] https://github.com/apache/cayenne/actions/
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Nikita Timofeev