Re: 4.2 modeler change

Lon Varscsak <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.cayenne.user
Message-ID <CALAw18yth1JoE9qvC0ovVkyfMDxbdJFfC0wptpk7H1dQBO+oow@mail.gmail.com>
I concur with the idea that a Java-served web app (hosted inside an
Electron app) would be best.

@Emmerson - I don't know if there were JIRAs created, I didn't create them
personally.

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 8:20 AM Michael Gentry <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 11:10 AM Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > As for the JS backend, the concern (at least from me) was that our
> > community is mostly Java developers, so it may be hard to support if a
> > primary author becomes unavailable. FWIW, it is less of a concern for me
> > these days, as JS world had matured significantly since the last time we
> > had this discussion.
> >
>
> I wouldn't do the backend in Node/JS with an Electron application if I
> could avoid it.  I'd bundle a Java-based microservice that the Electron UI
> starts up and uses to read/write Cayenne models, communicate with DBs via
> JDBC, etc.  With JavaFX I was just using the Cayenne JARs natively (no
> client/server architecture).
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.