Re: New "Property" classes requiring Persistent
Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.cayenne.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My vote would be to also remove a limitation on the object to extend Persistent in the Property API. From a quick glance, none of the functionality requires it, so this is purely a design decision. Expression class does not imply Persistent object anywhere, so I guess Property should not either. @Nikita, what do you think? Andrus > On Nov 15, 2019, at 1:50 AM, Lon Varscsak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > I use Property-type classes for all sorts of things, usually for Cayenne > related activities...but sometimes they're really useful on POJOs too. The > new Property related classes (like EntityProperty) require the class to be > a subclass of Persistent. I can't see where this is actually > relevant...but I might be missing something. Any reason we couldn't remove > this restriction? > > Thanks, > > Lon > > P.S. -- Still wishing these also implemented Serializable :P