Re: Questions about jvmti.h header

On 11/03/2009 04:27 AM, Michael Starzinger wrote:

> * Are there any plans to install the jvmti.h file (just like it is done
> with jni.h) or are there circumstances preventing such an installation?

That is probably just an oversight.

> * Why does the mentioned header include jvmti_md.h? All
> machine-dependent definitions should have already been covered by
> jni_md.h. Should the missing jvmti_md.h file be provided by the VM?

A VM may need to specialize some behavior in jvmti.h. Gcj did this, and 
it provides the missing jvmti_md.h. If jni_md.h supplies everything 
necessary, a "blank"/nop jvmti_md.h will suffice.

> I also stumbled upon a mailing list post[1] dealing with this topic. But
> it seems to me that only a small part[2] actually made it into the GNU
> Classpath source, the rest remained in the GCJ source.

I think this is self-explanatory now: jvmti_md.h is VM-dependent and 
should be supplied by the VM vendor. That's why that file never made it 
into classpath. It wouldn't help any other VM.

Keith