Re: Clarification and apologies (was Re: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system)

On 09/05/2014 12:07 PM, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> After reading in a previous post that Classpath was not being
> "actively developed" anymore, I said that it would be a pity to let
> the project die, and suggested that perhaps it was time to look for an
> adopter (http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath/2014-August/003270.html)

That was perhaps my fault; I said it was not being actively developed,
when I should have said it was not much being actively developed.
That's a subtle distinction, but one that matters to some people.

Andrew.