Re: classpathx audit

Arnaud Vandyck <[email protected]> Tue, 06 Apr 2004 10:12:03 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 20:20, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> told me to report about our project and
>> the compromise:
>> 
>> classpathx is clean!
>> 
>> I have an old CVS repository on my machine and when I did a cvs update,
>> noticed no differences between my local repository and the Savannah one.
>
> Just to make sure that I didn't misunderstand.
> Did you follow the text about the before/after compromise comparison at
> http://savannah.gnu.org/statements/changesets-available.txt.asc
> And is the changeset for classpathx mentioned in the text above
> (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/savannah/changsets/classpathx-changes.tar.gz)
> precisely the same as the differences you noted between your local
> version and the Savannah one?

After reading all the diff's, I can say that everything is OK for
classpathx/jaxp. I'll make some more investigation in other sub-projects
later.

Regards,

- --
Arnaud
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAcmZV4vzFZu62tMIRAuTNAJ9pRO3sWR1W3ulgI/AtNchzHbje4QCfYzP8
cpXxXUSOJvOuwaptEciyc2w=
=dL/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----