Re: classpathx audit
Arnaud Vandyck <[email protected]> Tue, 06 Apr 2004 10:12:03 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 20:20, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: >> Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> told me to report about our project and >> the compromise: >> >> classpathx is clean! >> >> I have an old CVS repository on my machine and when I did a cvs update, >> noticed no differences between my local repository and the Savannah one. > > Just to make sure that I didn't misunderstand. > Did you follow the text about the before/after compromise comparison at > http://savannah.gnu.org/statements/changesets-available.txt.asc > And is the changeset for classpathx mentioned in the text above > (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/savannah/changsets/classpathx-changes.tar.gz) > precisely the same as the differences you noted between your local > version and the Savannah one? After reading all the diff's, I can say that everything is OK for classpathx/jaxp. I'll make some more investigation in other sub-projects later. Regards, - -- Arnaud -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAcmZV4vzFZu62tMIRAuTNAJ9pRO3sWR1W3ulgI/AtNchzHbje4QCfYzP8 cpXxXUSOJvOuwaptEciyc2w= =dL/o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----