Re: Re: LibxmlJ formalities

David Brownell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.java.classpath.extensions.discuss
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
>>I have chosen `gnu.xml.libxmlj' as package root for this project,
>>`gnu.xml.libxmlj.transform' as package name for the XSL transformation
>>part, and I'll use `libxmlj' as CVS module name. OK?
> 
> 
> That's great.

Yep -- a fine thing to have.  I've never been a rabid believer in
"100% Pure Java", and javax.xml.transform using libxslt sounds like
like it should be good.  How does that compare (speed and memory)
with the typical 100% pure implementations?

- db
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.